Causal inference studies what would happen under interventions rather than what merely co-moves in observed data. The field connects design, assumptions, and estimation: a randomized trial, a DAG, an IV design, and a weighted estimator are all different ways to argue for the same counterfactual comparison. The core practical question is not whether a model fits well, but whether the identifying assumptions are plausible for the estimand you actually care about. Read the tables as a workflow: define the target effect, map the data-generating process, choose an identification strategy, stress-test the assumptions, and only then optimize estimation.
What This Cheat Sheet Covers
This topic spans 11 focused tables and 92 indexed concepts. Below is a complete table-by-table outline of this topic, spanning foundational concepts through advanced details.
Table 1: Core Frameworks
| Concept | Example | Description |
|---|---|---|
Y(1), Y(0) observed: Y = TY(1) + (1-T)Y(0) | Counterfactual framework for defining causal effects. | |
ATE = E[Y(1)-Y(0)] | Population-average effect. | |
ATT = E[Y(1)-Y(0) \mid T=1] | Effect for units that actually received treatment. | |
CATE(x) = E[Y(1)-Y(0) \mid X=x] | Effect conditional on covariates. |