New: Cookbooks and AI ExplanationsStep-by-Step recipes to solve problems connected to Roadmaps and Cheat Sheets. Need more details? Use AI buttons for structured and simple explanations with concrete examples throughout the whole platform.Take a look
15 recipes Β· 105 steps Β· about 91 minutes of reading
You keep saying a prompt looks better without ever checking it against the same real questions twice.
I have fifty test answers and no time to read every single one by hand.
My RAG system retrieves the right paragraph and still tells the user something the document never said.
I wrote my own faithfulness check by hand, and now every new metric I want means another script to write and debug.
Reading the code my model wrote, it looks fine, and then it crashes the first time somebody feeds it a real input.
My automated judge says every answer passes, but a teammate reading the same batch disagrees on a third of them.
One version of my prompt looked better on ten test runs, and I have no idea if that was real or luck.
Support keeps forwarding the same three complaints and I never turn them into anything I can test against.
My RAG system gave a wrong answer, and I can't tell if it retrieved the wrong chunk or the model just ignored a good one.
How do you know your last prompt fix didn't just break something else?
My agent got the right answer, but it called the search tool four times when one call was enough.
Retrieval recall went up when I widened top-k, and the RAG answers came out worse instead of better.
Your eval dashboard shows a score drop, and you have no way to tell which prompt change caused it.
Same question, reworded. One time correct, one time wrong.
Every single reply in the conversation looks fine on its own, and the user still leaves the chat unresolved.
Cookbook badge
Finish all 15 recipes to earn this.